|
Contact
Teacher's Mission Statement
Community
Studies: Publications
Educational Resources
Historic Sites in Scarborough Heights
Links for Toronto Links
mccowan.org
Scarboro Heights Record
The Lowland Clearances
Table of Contents
Sources
Acknowledge-
ments
Scottish Diaspora Tapestry
| |
Your
“mark” represents how someone ELSE feels about YOUR learning. Huh?
D.B. McCowan, P.Eng.
Wouldn't it be great if life was nothing but yes / no? Or True
/ False? Life is definitely not binary.
What if life was Multiple Choice? Or "Fill in the
Blanks"? You are still dreaming! Life is on a spectrum -- a broad
range. It takes serious thinking to make good decisions to get through life
successfully.
The quality of your learning in a high school course depends a
great deal on the quality of the Thinking that you do in the course. The highest
quality of thinking is to "Evaluate" -- to measure something against
agreed-upon reasonable and sensible criteria.
And, honestly, who is the best person to establish the
criteria for your learning? YOU!
You have seen lots of "Marking Schemes". You've seen
many "Rubrics". Same thing? Doesn't matter.
What matters is you being in charge of your
learning. In other words -- you should design your own criteria for your own
learning.
|
Open File / Link |
A Few Details |
| Rubrics |
How to Make a Good Rubric
-Peer Assessment
-General "Sample Rubrics" -- Use as Models for "Specialized" Rubrics
---Basic Understanding of A Concept -- "Knowing" and "Connecting"
---Application of a Concept -- "Doing" and "Contextualizing"
---Procedures and Skills -- "Doing" and "Using"
---Written Communication
|
| Design Process
Rubrics |
Some Rubrics for the Design Process
-Developing a Focus & Recognizing the Problem / Situation / Opportunity
-Generating a Set of Alternatives
-Choosing a Likely Best Solution Concept
-Peer / Group Assessment
-Protocol Creation -- Completion of Learning |
| Rubric_Information_Processing_Oct30_16 |
Rubric for Effectiveness of Information Processing
-Quality of Thinking and Depth of Understanding
-Novice vs. Master
-"Ideas" Level 1 -- <60%
-"Connections" Level 2 -- Novice 60% to 69%
-"Extensions" Level 3 -- 70% to 79%
-"Critical Reflection" Level 4 -- Master 80% to 100%
|
| DesignProcessDetails_Gr11_Sept16_14- |
Have another look at this file about the Design Process
|
| Design_Process_Review_Gr12_June9_16 |
The Design Process Review -- Pulling It All Together
-Your product deliverables -- output documentation
-Did you follow our sound Design Process in your project?
Extension Views of Problem-Solving
-Analysis… Leads to Hypothesis (Type 3 Problem)
-Experimentation and Measurement (Type 4 Problem)
-Building a Product (Type 5 Problem)
-Derive Concepts from the Fundamentals – Develop Your Own Learning Strategies
-Look at the Inter-Relationships Between Systems – Think About Possible Unexpected Outputs
|
| MarkingScheme_Probl_Solving_3DCAD_Oct30_16-1 |
Marking Scheme for Using 3D Parametric CAD Software in
a Problem Solving Project
|
| Reflection_Rubric_Shop_Oct31_16- |
Reflection on Shop Work
|
| Fabrication_Rubrics_Oct30_16 |
Fabrication / Build Skills – Product Construction and Performance
-Product Safety, Function and Ergonomics
-Materials Selection and Utilization
-Construction: Attention to Detail, Quality and Pride of Craft
-Design Process Documentation |
| Written_Report_Rubric_Oct30_16 |
Rubric for a Written Report, Design Document or Other Portfolio
Entry
-Content
-Clarity of Message and General Criteria
-Format / Presentation
Rubric for Quality of Communication
Novice Vs. Master |
Previous
Next
|